Road width and Amaravati plot prices: what the recorded numbers can explain

What the research shows

• Property Desk calculation: The 12 m, 15.6 m and 17 m recorded maximum-boundary-road-width groups contain 68, 251 and 240 retained records respectively; each has a ₹42,000 median asking rate per sq yd.

  [1]

• Property Desk calculation: The 25 m group contains 59 retained records and has a median asking rate of ₹45,000 per sq yd. This is a descriptive association.

  [1]

• Property Desk calculation: 65 of 68 records in the 12 m group carry a commercial-use label, while 170 of 240 in the 17 m group carry a residential-use label.

  [1]

Property Desk research context

Amaravati Property Desk analysed advertised asking prices captured on 27 August 2026. The figures describe that snapshot and are not completed-sale prices.

Three recorded widths share one sample median

After the stated quality checks and outlier removal, the 12 m, 15.6 m and 17 m recorded-width groups all have a median asking rate of ₹42,000 per sq yd. The equality does not mean the properties have equal access or value. It means this broad grouping does not support a simple rule that each increase in recorded road width produces a higher asking rate.

• 12 m maximum recorded boundary-road width: 68 records; median asking rate ₹42,000 per sq yd; median advertised area 150 sq yd.
• 15.6 m maximum recorded boundary-road width: 251 records; median asking rate ₹42,000 per sq yd; median advertised area 330 sq yd.
• 17 m maximum recorded boundary-road width: 240 records; median asking rate ₹42,000 per sq yd; median advertised area 390 sq yd.
• 25 m maximum recorded boundary-road width: 59 records; median asking rate ₹45,000 per sq yd; median advertised area 500 sq yd.

The groups contain different properties

The 12 m group is strongly commercial in this capture: 65 of 68 records. Its median area is 150 sq yd and median total ask ₹64.5 Lacs. The 17 m group has 170 residential records among 240, with a 390 sq yd median area and ₹1.75 Cr median total. These mixes are not controlled experiments on road width.

The 25 m group's median asking rate is ₹45,000 per sq yd, but its location, use and area mix also differ. We cannot attribute the gap to road width alone. The 50 m group has only 4 retained records, below the five-record publication threshold for a group median, so no 50 m price benchmark is published here.

What exactly is the road field?

The field is the maximum boundary-road width carried in the dated APCRDA LPS snapshot context. It is not a fresh measurement of a usable carriageway, a frontage dimension or proof of lawful motor access. A maximum can also conceal differences between the roads recorded on different sides of a plot. Ask which boundary and document the description refers to.

The research source separately contains proximity to named road geometry. That is another kind of evidence. A straight-line distance to a mapped road is not a driving distance, an entrance route or evidence that the road is operational. Do not combine the two fields into a single 'good access' badge.

A road check needs more than one question

• What road relationship and width are recorded, and in which dated source?
• Which side of the actual property provides the proposed approach?
• What does a current site visit show about usable access and conditions?
• What independent document review is needed to establish lawful access?

A dated walkthrough can show the route used to reach a site and its visible condition. It should be linked to the property being discussed. It does not replace the documents needed for access rights, and a planning map does not replace the walkthrough.

Use price differences as questions

When a seller attributes a higher quote to a wider road, request the exact evidence and compare a small set of similar-use, similar-size properties. Keep the claimed benefit, public-source context and checked outcome in separate columns. The captured medians help test an overly broad sales explanation; they cannot determine the appropriate offer for an individual site.

How to read these figures

Unless a paragraph explicitly describes the original source or an excluded example, pricing and budget figures use 627 retained records: 400 residential and 227 commercial. We excluded 4 source exceptions, 14 unresolved area differences above 1% and 42 outliers using one-pass 1.5-IQR boundaries within advertised use on total ask, area and unit rate. Original records remain intact. Each retained property has equal weight; budget ceilings are inclusive; localities retain the source labels; group price medians require at least five records. Totals shown in Lacs and Cr are rounded to at most two decimals.

The import keeps the lowest positive advertised amount for each exact-code group. A median is the middle observation; the middle-half range runs from the 25th to 75th percentile. The figures describe this filtered, single-source capture. Current seller availability, authority, title, boundaries, approval and access require separate checks.